Sunday, June 15, 2025

AI Governance with Atlan: AI Use Circumstances, Danger Assessments, Workflows & Shadow AI Governance – Atlan

This visitor put up is by Sunil Soares, founder and CEO of YDC – AI Governance. Beforehand, he based and led Info Asset, an information administration agency. Sunil brings a deeply-researched perspective to AI governance—authoring 13 books which have formed how enterprises strategy information and AI at scale.

The YDC workforce developed an AI Governance prototype in Atlan. We reused the prevailing working mannequin with belongings and added customized attributes and relations.

AI Use Circumstances

As mentioned in an earlier weblog, a digital twin could also be a digital reproduction of a specific affected person that displays the distinctive genetic make-up of the affected person or a simulated three-dimensional mannequin that displays the traits of a affected person’s coronary heart. Digital twins could also be utilized to speed up scientific trials and scale back prices within the life sciences business. The YDC workforce carried out an outline of the Digital Twins for Medical Trials AI Use Case in Atlan.

AI Danger Assessments

We performed an AI Danger Evaluation for the use case with Atlan. Digital twins have the potential to introduce bias dangers primarily based on the algorithms and the underlying information units. We documented the bias danger evaluation and a mapping to the related laws in Atlan.

We additionally documented the privateness dangers in Atlan.

We documented different dimensions of AI danger together with Reliability, Accountability, Explainability and Safety in Atlan. For the sake of brevity, I’ve not included these screenshots right here.

This use case would probably be labeled as Excessive Danger primarily based on the Medical System class of Article 6 of the EU AI Act. 

AI Danger Evaluation Workflows

We configured an AI Danger Evaluation workflow in Atlan to route the AI Danger Evaluation to the suitable events for approval.

The screenshot under exhibits the AI Danger Evaluation in Accepted standing primarily based on approvals from the Operational Danger Administration Committee (ORMC) and the AI Governance Council.

Shadow AI Governance to Ingest Metadata from ServiceNow CMDB and YDC_AIGOV Brokers on Hugging Face to Spotlight COTS Apps with Embedded AI

In an earlier weblog, I mentioned Shadow AI Governance and the YDC_AIGOV brokers. As half of the present train, we ingested metadata across the Business-off-the-Shelf (COTS) apps into Atlan. This data consists of metadata corresponding to Software Title, Privateness Coverage URL, Information Particularly Excluded from AI Coaching, Embedded AI and Choose-Out Choice.
The screenshot under exhibits Atlan earlier than working the mixing with the YDC_AIGOV brokers. The catalog solely accommodates one AI Use Case (Digital Twins for Medical trials) and one utility (Google Product Providers).

After working the mixing with Atlan API, Atlan accommodates a broader listing of functions together with Actimize Xceed together with metadata in the precise panel.

Conditional Logic with Atlan API to Auto-Create AI Use Case and AI Danger Evaluation Objects

We carried out conditional logic within the Atlan API to auto-create AI use circumstances just for functions with embedded AI. On this case, we created an AI use case object in Atlan for Actimize Xceed as a result of Embedded AI = “Sure.”

We additionally carried out conditional logic within the Atlan API to auto-create AI Danger Evaluation objects the place Information Particularly Excluded for AI Coaching = “No.” Clearly, this logic is configurable.

This can be a fundamental AI Governance configuration in Atlan with extra to return!  

This put up was initially revealed on Your Information Join. Learn the unique article right here.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles